Last week we received an e-mail from Apple’s App review team notifying us that after 14 days of review, our latest update to iCombat Lite would not be accepted because of “inappropriate keywords.” The offending keyword was “wii tank,” and we had chosen this because many of our users have told us that our game reminded them of the tank mini game that is part of Wii Play.

While we knew not to use current iPhone app names as keywords, it had never in a million years occurred to us that “wii” might be problematic.  In Apple’s words, they “cannot post applications that contain irrelevant keywords in their search criteria” and suggested that “it would be appropriate to remove ‘wii tank.’”  Interesting since they: 1) had already approved our iCombat paid version with the same keyword, 2) have approved an app with Wii in the title, and 3) they had already rejected iCombat Lite two weeks prior for some other reason without mentioning any problems with the keywords.

What is so frustrating about this latest round of trivial rejections is that the app review “feedback” seems to always come on day 14 (at the earliest), and happens serially.  To give you an idea, we first submitted iCombat Lite update 1.1 on September 8th, 41 days ago!  After being rejected for an issue Apple reported with the code on September 22nd, and spending several days working on replicating the bug (which we never even managed to), we resubmitted the exact same keywords and code on September 28th.

On October 12th (14 days later) we received notice that the entire update would need to be resubmitted because of the “wii tank” keyword.  Had anything changed from the approved iCombat Paid version or the previously rejected lite version?  Nothing at all…and so we deleted the words, resubmitted and for the third time started another 14 day approval cycle.  All in all, if we are lucky we expect the iCombat Lite update to be approved on October 26th, just 48 days to get to market (42 if we subtract the days we took to work on the first rejection).

Reasons to Avoid Developing for the iPhone

Ignoring how illogical this last keyword rejection has been, the real damage of the current app approval process is that it has created a slow and arbitrary development environment that does nothing but discourage indie developers.  The biggest issues with this setup are:

1. Slower development cycles – As if figuring out what users wanted wasn’t hard enough, now add a 14 day approval delay which quickly turns into 1 month with any rejection and you have a buffer that really starts to isolate developers from their users and this constrains the feedback – iteration loop
2. Product/ Market fit is replaced with Product/ Apple fit – To use Andreesen’s advice (worth a read), entrepreneurs should “do whatever is required to achieve product/ market fit.”  Here the only thing that matters is finding what users want and giving it to them.  Yet with Apple as the gatekeeper success is not determined by the market but first by whether Apple will LET you play in its garden. This perverts the goals of the developer and ultimately reduces the chances that an efficient product/ market fit can occur.  You could even argue that on the off chance that you find an exceptional product/ market fit you are at even a higher risk of being cannibalized or pulled or copied by Apple itself.
3. Impossible ROI calculations – If you are trying to run a business based off of App development, how can you possibly calculate the return on your investment when you have no control over your launch to market? Unless you are ngmoco with funding from Kleiner Perkins then how can you build a business on top of such uncertainty (market and execution risks should be more than enough to contend with without having to worry about the d-bag app reviewer risk)
4. App approval amnesia and the lack of a fast track system – What seems to be happening all too often is that previously approved apps, after waiting weeks in the queue, get rejected for features that had already been approved in past releases.  This approval amnesia combined with being lumped in with new app approvals creates a developer disincentive to work on refining applications.  Does it make sense when iCombat Lite, having been live for 3 months with 100k installs and no complaints, suffers a 40+ day delay because it is being forced to the back of the line over and over again to wait amongst what is new crapware?  The sooner these apps can get updates out the sooner they can deliver high quality experiences to Apple users.

All of these factors serve to undermine developer confidence, reduce the quality of apps in the store, and ultimately choke app development activity.  Developers are already looking to other platforms and are limiting investment as the environment has simply become too unpredictable to work with.  Sure Apple has its reasons, namely pushing its 85k or 100k or 250k apps commercials to prove it has the most evolved app ecosystem versus its peers.  But if Apple doesn’t fix these problems soon, those numbers will begin to mean less and less, and at some point the number of apps in the App store will be about as meaningful as the number of videos uploaded to YouTube.

Related articles by Zemanta

• iPhone Apps: From Idea to Implementation (slideshare.net)
• Big Game Publishers Muscle In On iPhone Upstarts (wired.com)
• ngmoco Hires MySpace Executive Jason Oberfest to Helm Social Applications (wireless.ign.com)
• Shazam hits 50 million user mark and raises funding from Kleiner Perkins (thenextweb.com)

“For example, if the game allowed you to pause it while you placed towers or if there were a few more seconds between wave launches, Star Defense would lose its fast pace. If we altered the strength of the towers or how much it cost to upgrade them, it would influence how you played the game. If we handed out more credits for each enemy unit killed, it would change how you managed tower purchases and upgrades.”

Players underestimate just how difficult it is to design a game with a nice balance between being rewarding to play but challenging enough to want to continue playing.  Even with iCombat, which has a very simple game mechanic, it took several weeks to refine the level design and lay them out in a way that provided a steady progression from level 1 through 60. And this initial design has been refined and tuned throughout every update.

Aside from the level design which is the most visible factor that can affect game play, there are things like enemy AI (firing frequency, movement paths, speed, etc), the scoring mechanism, the frequency of power-ups or bonus items, the number of lives, upgrade prices and so one that are crucial to getting the game right.

An example of just how intentional these design elements are can be seen in iCombat’s score system, where many users wondered why we chose to go with a countdown (Enigmo style) method where each level begins counting back from 10,000.  The decision was focused at creating a scoring mechanic that rewarded speed, thus creating a nice interplay between playing it safe to preserve lives or playing fast to get points.  The result is that no 2 scores are ever alike.  This might seem like a small detail, but for the avid users it creates an entirely different decision tree when facing the harder, more involved levels.  Do you hide to preserve life, let the time expire, and then execute a level safely?  Or do you go guns blazing to finish with as many points as possible?  To extend this decision tree further and equalize players across difficulty level we made the countdown 12,000 for Hard mode, 10,000 for Medium and 8,000 for easy.

Another great example of where we made a decision to point the user behavior a certain direction came from the fact that one shot equals a player kill.  Here the logic was to force users to play more conservatively, pushing creative calculations with ricochet’s and bonus items.  And by limiting the map size, we managed to create a campaign mode that could be done in bite sized chunks, 5 minutes here and there.

So the next time you play a game think about how every single detail in the game was deisgned intentionally that way.  There are no default game layouts or settings so if it is in a game then the developer wanted it there.  Whether it was the right choice or not is a separate issue, but sometimes it helps to remember just how difficult it is to get the balance right.

Related articles by Zemanta

• BioWare’s Gaider: story is important, but not that important (destructoid.com)
• GDC Europe 09: Peter Molyneux (semanticmetadata.net)
• Review: GI Joe’s maddening controls, game mechanics a letdown (canada.com)

See some screenshots of the game below:

You can check it out in iTunes here or visit our Silver Skull site here

Related articles by Zemanta

• Talk Like a Pirate Day 2009 gets its own World of Warcraft party (inquisitr.com)
• Talk Like A Pirate Day (yesbutnobutyes.com)
• Talk Like a Pirate Day Widget: TRY THIS (blippitt.com)
• HOW TO: Celebrate International Talk Like a Pirate Day (mashable.com)

And while part of my hesitation had to do with my optimism about iCombat’s potential and my marketing ability, it also had to do with the fact that I rarely buy full versions of games (although I do occasionally). After just launching my lite version yesterday I can say that my concerns about the lite version were misplaced and might have cost me quite a bit in lost income. Below are my main takeaways from having waited on launching the lite version and why I think too many indie iPhone developers wrongly steer clear of lite versions:

1. Know your Apps Core value and its core user: This sounds douchey but it really is harder than it sounds to have the discipline to know the profile of your core user and then choose that feature you think will resonate most.  For example, if you are making a game it is easy to think kids and adults will like it and they will all get hooked on the game play AND the graphics AND the story equally.  Odds are your app will not resonate with everyone, and one salient feature will be the hook so the sooner you figure it out and admit it to yourself the better. You may be wrong, but better to know your target than water down your strategy by pursuing too many angles.  Needless to say once you have your app’s core value outlined it will also be that much easier to design your lite version.
2. The App store is not a lemonade stand: The App store is one of the largest, most seamless content delivery platforms ever and when it comes to pricing most of us fail to understand just how fundamentally different this is from anything we have ever seen.  As a result we apply our personal conceptions of scarcity, value or what it means to transact with someone to something that is totally different.  If you have released an app you will agree that pricing decisions or the debate about a lite version are often more emotional than rational.  I am sure more than one developer has though “I don’t want to give it to someone for free when I worked 3 months on it every night after work while my wife was screaming at me because I was never around.”  That would be okay to think if you toiled on a model airplane or a painting for that period and were selling the one unit you had created, but in the App store you can divide that effort across 40MM+ people so who really cares if 5MM users get your app for free if in the end 250k of them buy it?
3. Be careful about buying into the media hype: I am not going to preach like everyone else about how little is being made on average. I don’t care about that because no one gets into App development to be average – if we didn’t all think we were working on the next Enigmo we probably wouldn’t be doing it.   I am talking more about the marketing angle.  Don’t fool yourself about how hard it is to get noticed, especially as the bigger game makers start to move to the iPhone platform.   It is getting more and more difficult to get blog coverage  so if you don’t have either a major platform to launch from or an existing fan base to leverage, your main form of exposure will be the lite version.
4. The blogosphere is like steroids (but it won’t make you #1): Many developers see Gizmodo or Techcrunch as the definitive tipping point, and it could be for an app but if your app does not deliver the viral hook no blog will save it.  As far as I can tell there haven’t been any cases of a blog breaking an app that then jumped to #1 and stayed there for a long amount of time (please correct me if wrong).  Blogs are like steroids, can help you get from 10th to 1st or from 500th to 400th, but not from 10,000th to 1st.
5. Don’t hide from App store criticism & negative ratings. Tying back to the second point, it is hard to take criticism for something you have worked hard on and so there is a natural hesitation to launching a lite app as users can be much more harsh reviewers. Again the goal is to get die hard fans to buy a copy, so it is OK if tons of people don’t like your game or review it poorly because all you need is some that really love it to spread the word. Maybe not launching a lite version allows for more control over the reviews (as there seems to be a natural bias of paying users to give better reviews) but this helps no one. This only reduces the total amount of people discovering your app and limits your earning potential.

Bottom line developers need to stop pricing their apps and deciding strategy based on vague feelings of what is value or what is deserved.  With frictionless transaction costs and so many users, your worst enemy for getting noticed may just be yourself.  So we should all stop thinking about how our 3 months of work is selling for less than a cup of coffee (or could be given away for free) and start focusing on increasing the amount of people using our apps.

Related articles by Zemanta

• iPhone AIM and Beejive IM Apps With Push Notifications Are Live [IPhone Apps] (gizmodo.com)
• Apple’s New iPhone Pumps Up Battery Life, Graphics [Wwdc] (kotaku.com)
• iPhone: Twittelator Pro Makes Tweet Casting Possible (Audio And Video Now Included) (blogherald.com)
• Tales from Development Hell – Why iPhone Developers Have It Good (cultofmac.com)

WTF man. Nobody does this. Ever. And the damn point of Installous is to let you try before you buy. And you just f—– up the whole system. So f— you dude, I would have bought it after trying it out, IF it was any good. I think it probably sucks so you don’t want people to test it out first…Nice job man. Way to suck at life. And I hope that nobody will buy from you just because of this.

I was in customer service mode when I saw this post so I quickly fired off one of the most unnecessarily nice e-mails of my life:

Hey dude,
Thanks for the post.  I disagree with you that most people use Installous to try before they buy.  So you know, I spent the last 3 months on this project and currently over 60% [of users] are not paying.

I get your point…and what I was trying to do here was convert the type of people you are not talking about (those that pirate everything with no intent to buy) as opposed to letting it just go unchecked.

I would like you to try the game though…would you download it if I sent you a promo code?  Let me know.
Thanks.

Now me sending this e-mail was crazy I know but from my point of view iCombat had just launched and I didn’t want to have anyone be negative on my app.  What followed my e-mail was surprising, the pirate responded in a very conciliatory tone, apologizing and so I sent him the promo code.  His response several days later was enthusiastic, saying “I love the app dude, it’s awesome.”  And this is where the craziness begins, he then proceeded to make a YouTube clip of the game and he even offered to host a contest and do a more serious quality demo. I even found a comment of his on YouTube where he actually attacked a pirate who linked through to a piracy site.  This pirate had gone from cursing me out to cursing out other pirates, defending my interests and helping get the word out about Combat.

Now maybe this pirate was emotionally unstable or just a kid, but either way I learned quite a bit from the experience.  Key lessons below:

1. There are a lot of fanatical people on the web

• If you have dealt with customers on the web you can attest to this fact. There are a decent amount of people that seem to have nothing better to do than criticize or evangelize your product.  Needless to say this can be both good and bad.

2. On the web, everyone is your customer

• Since anyone, even people who aren’t paying customers (or even customers for that matter) can share their opinion about your product, you have to treat everyone as if they are a customer.  It’s kind of like when you walk in to a nice hotel and get treated like a guest even when you aren’t one.  Not only can these hotels not afford to be wrong, but they benefit anytime someone experiences their brand.

3. You never know which of your users (legal or illegal) has the largest digital footprint

• On the web, having influence is largely a result of putting in the time. As a result having influence usually results from a user being passionate and being willing to put in the time (Scoble or Kawasaki sending out Twitter updates on a Saturday night comes to mind) but this energy can also stem from a user being just being crazy or immature
• So while tapping users as evangelists of your product is extremely effective, the flip side is that you have to go extra far to keep your users happy so they don’t go rogue and try to sink your brand across the web

4. On the web, user opinion is the ONLY thing

• Unlike a brick and mortar business for example, web businesses have no geographic advantages like default foot traffic (unless you have a web domain that is self explanatory like pets.com or is a typo of Google)
• The digital herd is influenced primarily by word of mouth and the experience you leave customers with so loyalty is everything

I know in my example above my e-mail was a bit like asking someone robbing my store if they were finding everything they needed.  On the surface it sounds ridiculous but if you are just getting started you need everyone to speak highly of your product.  Was giving him a promo code crazy?  This pirate took the time to comment on my website (literally 1 out of every 300 that visited did) so he was clearly the type of internet user who is willing to spend the time posting to sites.  Developers give promo codes to fans and bloggers for reviews so is letting an active pirate spread awareness any different? Anyone who loves your app will talk about it to friends, be seen using the app in public and potentially be an influencer online.

The key take away is that every user counts, so even if you don’t genuinely care about your users (hopefully you do) the next time you get a question or e-mail from a tedious customer just remember that the power lies with you whether that person chooses to help or hurt your brand.

Related articles by Zemanta

• @TheForefront: Successfully Navigating Social Media (slideshare.net)
• Tips for Startups in Social Networking (techwag.com)
• Scoble !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (cnewmark.com)

In previous posts I have suggested to first time app developers the importance of creating proper specs when planning to create an app.  I think mockup tools like Balsamiq are even more useful than making great specs and writing out usage scenario examples.  Not only does it help you better develop your idea but it also gives you the ability to share your mockups with other people instantly.  For example, if you are thinking about outsourcing development or are talking to other team members, Balsamiq will let you share your mockups and convey clearly what you want to do (for info on how to protect your idea with outsourced developers read this post).  And by visually demonstrating the flow of how you want your app to work developers will have a much better idea of what you are looking for.  This will pay off in terms of the quality of developer you manage to get and it will also improve the accuracy of the time and budget estimates you get from developers.

Even if you plan on developing the app yourself, you can benefit from working through the fuzzy parts of your idea.  A mockup tool will give you the simple tools you need to work through EVERY aspect of your app structure before you begin the development process.  This is important because it can alert you to fundamental flaws in your idea or logic before you put the time and effort into building it.

In addition to the sketches of the iPhone and its main interface tools you also have sketches of dozens of buttons, switches, icons and other items that you can customize.  For example, when you drag an iPhone image to the drawing area, a box pops up where you can select whether to include the status toolbar at the top, change the orientation, the background look, etc.  You can even drag call out boxes into the picture as well to insert commentary about your mockup.  Check out this video for an example of what is possible.

Balsamiq includes a free trial version so you can test it out today…give it 5 minutes and you will see how quickly you get the hang of it.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Don’t Have an iPhone But Love its Gaming Apps ? Here’s The Alternative (techpluto.com)
• The Week in iPhone Apps: Grow Up, Slacker [IPhone Apps] (gizmodo.com)
• Developers Sneaking Porn, Profanity Onto iPhone Via Easter Eggs (cultofmac.com)
• You should be using Balsamiq Mockups (devlicio.us)
• 5 of the Best iPhone Apps for Political Junkies (mashable.com)

As a first time developer I wanted to protect my effort but did not want to pay an upfront fee to Ripdev without having made a dime so I opted to go for the more benign yet not totally passive option.  I chose to detect when they cracked the application and then have a pop-up screen say something inoffensive along with a button routing them away from game play after 5 levels.  The button redirected the pirate to a hidden page I created on my site called “You Jacked My App” where the text read:

“Hi if you have been directed to this page it’s because we see that you have a pirated copy.  While we are glad you are interested please understand that we want to continue making it better, but to do that we need people to each pay for their copy.  If you want to continue using please purchase today.”

The idea was to get the user to empathize with my cause and maybe convert a tiny fraction of those users into sales.  While it was a cheesy move and probably a bad idea I figured it couldn’t hurt to try (maybe I should have just rickroll’d them all!).  For a great example of a better executed version of this strategy see developer Ben Chatelain’s pop-up here which mentions needing the sales to help feed his 1 year old!  I just found this but had I seen it pre-iCombat 1.0 I would probably have implemented something similarly guilt evoking.

See below some stats to give you an idea of the scope of the problem for iCombat as well as some conclusions I have drawn from the experience:

A few thoughts on the data:

1) Pirates are extremely early adopters:

• iCombat was cracked and posted to Twitter before even propagating through all of Apple’s servers (I’d say within 30 minutes from going live).  Their adoption on the front end was much quicker than the paying user.  Nothing beats free…

2) There is no feedback culture among app pirates

• I am not sure whether they rely on legit app reviews or just word of mouth, but surprising that no one anywhere posted a warning that iCombat was blocked after just 5 levels (of 20).  As far as I know the cracking apps only utilize the plist hack so it is not an issue of hackers having found a workaround to my pop-up (I could be wrong here)

3) The overall pirate community is smaller than I had expected, but much more active

• 5 to 1 ratio off the bat in terms of pirated copies to purchased
• leveled off at about 1 to 1 ratio over the last few weeks before I removed the block (since then it has gone back up but on much smaller volume)
• iCombat has had dozens of Tweets about cracked versions of the game
• Cracking is a source of pride for pirates, and this pushes them to disseminate more aggressively

4) There was a high clickthrough rate to my site (only way user could avoid would have been to press home button) but once there ZERO users clicked through to purchase a copy.  Maybe if I had mentioned a 1 year old baby this would have been higher.

Some considerations specific to iCombat:

• iCombat was priced at $0.99 throughout this period
• Initial coverage in Gizmodo at launch plus the fact that iCombat is a familiar theme (tank game reminiscent of Combat for Atari or Wii Tanks game) might have also pushed an abnormal amount of geeks/ pirates to download it

Conclusions:

1) Piracy is still not that big of a problem when talking about the apps with larger download volumes

• Dave Castelnuovo from Pocket God was generous enough to share with me that they are only seeing a 5%-10% piracy rate for example.  While this could be in part because of Pocket God’s rapid update cycle which renders each pirated version outdated after just a week or two, it might also be a sign that the cracking community still isn’t that large on a relative scale.  This argument is supported by my declining per cent of pirates relative to overall downloads.

2) Blocking pirates is not worth it unless you can push conversion by giving them a lite style version

• Strategically structure the cracked game so pirates get the upsell, in iCombat’s case I would do (planning on a lite version soon) limited weapons, limited levels, no global high scores (coming in 1.2), etc.  Again for a good example of this see the link to Ben Chatelain’s 10 day demo strategy (above).
• A full block risks damaging the brand for non-pirates (could be perceived as a bug) or of creating a backlash by disgruntled pirates.  Not worth the risk.

3) Don’t cut off your nose to spite your face

• The goal behind launching an app isn’t thwarting pirates, it is getting users and generating sales so leave the “making a point” anti-piracy measures to the big guys. The competition is so fierce to get noticed in the App store that any attention is good attention.  Ethan Nicholas from iShoot fame probably isn’t too worried about the small pirate minority seeing as how he sold a couple hundred thousand copies of iShoot at $2.99.
• In most cases there is not a direct cannibalization of your sales by people using cracked copies – unless you have a high priced niche app the cost is negligible and the market is not zero sum (see my upcoming posts on my conversations with pirates that backs this up)
• There is a ton of anger and energy spent thinking about pirates (see the iPhoneDevSDK forum here for examples), this energy should be put into creating better apps and focusing on the top line potential.  In my case there are design issues that I should have focused on rather than trying to spoil the pirate’s experience.

So What Do We Do?

Assuming you have a relatively cheap app with a wide potential audience and what you perceive to be a long term value proposition, I think the best solution is to create a version akin to a lite version of the app for pirates.  It is no good to shut off access to the app completely, but it also doesn’t get you very far to give away the core value you are offering to the paying user.  I have decided I am going to do this for the next update of my app and hope that happy users, be they paying or pirates, will help spread the word and get iCombat above the App store noise.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Crackulous Allows for App Store Piracy [App Store] (i.gizmodo.com)
• Nine Inch Nailed – more App Store rejection ‘fun’ (cultofmac.com)
• Pirates Board Apple’s iPhone App Store (wired.com)
• Top Twitter iPhone and iPod Touch Apps (livecrunch.com)

The rise of the fractured, multichannel market has created dozens of sites that developers now need to visit to build goodwill and help gain exposure, something that is fundamentally different from what they probably want to be doing. In my case this translates into 18-20 hours a day since launch to manage the marketing effort and frankly it is still more than I can handle. While I have enlisted friends and an intern to help, most developers don’t have the luxury of dedicating all of their own time to managing their launch.

I have compiled a list of some of the tools and sites I think necessary to use today:

Top Down channels – kissing the ring

1. Bloggers – what some refer to as the “digital influencers” – sites with major traffic like Gizmodo, Techcrunch, GigaOM
2. Targeted review sites – Touch Arcade, 148Apps, Pocket Gamer, etc. – I have counted 60+ serious ones in all

Bottom Up channels – connecting with your users

1. Facebook – both personal status and group page
2. Twitter
3. MySpace
4. App/ Development/ Gaming Forums - Touch Arcade, maybe iPhonedevSDK, etc.
5. Product website & blog – here you need to have a demo, maybe a news section and your blog
6. YouTube – a great way to communicate with avid gamers
7. iTunes App store summary

Analytics Tools – monitoring usage, downloads, buzz

1. User downloads – iTunes Connect – Heartbeat App or AppViz (super easy to use but less flexible than Heartbeat)
2. Usage behavior – Pinch Media – gives you uniques, geo data, version & device stats, as well as unique data by action in your App (very cool)
3. App ranking – AppRanking by Michael Dorn or Mobclix
4. Web traffic - Google Analytics or Wordpress Stats
5. Affiliate data – Linkshare – here if you are an Apple affiliate you can earn back 5% of your 30% cut that goes to Apple – and monitor clickthrough conversion data from your site
6. Brand management – ScoutLabs or Google Alerts – Scout doesn’t really seem to work for small apps or early on in a campaign as it is, for these smaller apps Google Alerts is a great basic filter

While this list is not comprehensive this is basically everything I am using for the marketing of iCombat. I didn’t realize just how many channels and tools this involved until trying to post an urgent piece of news.  When iCombat was reviewed in Gizmodo’s weekly roundup of iPhone apps I quickly wanted to update every channel I was using.

Spreading the word for that first update went something like this: first update Twitter, then my Facebook status, then the Facebook “Fans of iCombat” group news section, then the iCombat website news page, then the Touch Arcade forum thread discussing iCombat, then I finally shot some e-mails to friends (funny I actually just realized in writing this that I forgot to update my App description in iTunes for the good review – add that to the list).

Once I had finished with the news updates, 2 hours later, I started to comb the anaytics tools: first Pinch media, then user reviews in iTunes, then Mobclix to see if rankings had hit, then Wordpress stats to see website hits, then Linkshare to see the conversion rates, then Scout Labs to check for buzz.

What I experienced was the effects of the new multichannel model where the developer has had to become a social media explorer, pushing into every nook and cranny of the social web.  From gamer forums to niche blogs by 12 year old app reviewers (they do exist), developers risk ignoring these communities at their own expense.  With users fatigued by so much new product noise, it is easy for an unmonitored launch to go unnoticed by these users.

Not all products are good enough to sell themselves, and even if they are amazing, the system isn’t efficient yet at rewarding quality (more on this later).  So while I concede part of the problem is that most developers don’t have the time, especially amateur ones, to dedicate to marketing, I do think we all still need to shift our attention to just how important app marketing is.  Traditionally, developers seem to look at rising to the top in the App store as primarily a question of the product.  I would argue that in most cases it is equal parts product and packaging (dare I say it may be even more about packaging).  This new balance should be weighed when estimating the time, cost and energy it will take to execute your idea – i.e. when laying out a development time line, product features and depth of marketing focus should be weighed as equally relevant factors (as each is a drain on your resources, be it time, money or energy).

I don’t know the reason developers ignore marketing as much as they do.  While it is undeniably a question of bandwidth, it must also have to do with the underlying personality traits of developers as a group.  The desire to code, to focus on the hard part leads to a natural urge to ignore the boring marketing and a disdain for the whoring out that is pushing a product.  In the case of iCombat, we too struggled to stay engaged once we launched the app, but had to remember that we were only half the way there.  In our case, I was planning and handling marketing all along, so like a relay, my work began as the coding ended.

As a lone developer, the combination of fatigue at the end of a project and the lack of desire to get into “marketing” mode is what leads to developers choosing to focus on the wrong thing.  Here is where most developers launch, email their friends and family and a few review blogs, and then return to working on updates for their app.  This decision to immediately turn back to updating is precisely where most developers doom their apps (I am not talking about gimmicky apps or super early launch and iterate strategies like Pocket God).  In my mind this is just like carrying a child around for nine months, giving birth and then deciding to not feed the baby.

The reason that post partum neglect is such a travesty (I will leave that horrible metaphor alone from here out I promise) is that the App store is the PERFECT place to get into marketing mode.  Content discovery is inefficient and the market is young so you can make an impact and experiment without knowing the landscape.  It’s like Junior Prom, in the App store; it’s basically everybody’s first time.

To understand the opportunity it helps to look to the music industry where content discovery dynamics are similar.  Here, the highly subjective nature of determining “quality” and the huge breadth of options makes ranking what is good difficult.  And it is precisely in this type of inefficient discovery marketplace – where success is not necessarily deserved that a system of patronage becomes key.  Since the music industry is a highly evolved market (although getting rocked by technology shifts), an elaborate web of connections has developed where bribes, quid pro quos, image consulting, content engineering and the like, all thrive.  The app market will eventually trend toward this, as do all markets, where market leaders seek to protect and enhance their competitive advantage, but for now it is still young.

In the App store the definition of what is “good” is all over the place, open to interpretation across the huge breadth of gaming, niche, utility, gimmicky and entertainment apps as well as age and demographic groups – so the opportunity to define what is good is wide open for anyone willing to get down into the dirt and push.  While it is fantastic that there is no system of patronage or well laid tracks in the app store in terms of rankings and exposure (as occurs in music), it is a bit like the Wild West in that everyone is in a land grab racing for market position (whether it be in App reviews, app analytics, brand management, or the apps themselves).  What’s clear is that the ones who will triumph aren’t those sitting waiting for the meritocracy to kick in, but rather those who act aggressively and start thinking creatively about how they can get noticed.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Opinion: Withdrawing from the addictive iPhone (macworld.com)
• iPhone app use over time (russellbeattie.com)
• Four Mobile App Stores Battle for User and Developer Attention (wired.com)
• The keys to App Store success, courtesy of Pinch Media (tuaw.com)

While I have been vague about what iCombat would be until now, I wanted to give you some background as to why we chose to do a classic arcade style tank game.  I grew up in the mid 80’s playing a beat up Atari 2600 – it was behind the times even then (let alone now!) but the good side of having the outdated console was that I could buy old Atari games at used book stores for under a dollar. I didn’t have the money, or need, back then to buy a newer console and it didn’t matter because the Atari had some of the best game play design of any console I have ever played.  Simple rules, easy to use controls, a fast learning curve, all of these things helped make it much easier than picking up today’s games (except maybe the Wii).

The game that captured my attention most was Combat, a 27 game in one combo pack that included the Tank game.  There were many variations of play, one of which was Tank pong – here you fired missiles (squares) at the other tank (a rectangle) and they could bounce off of walls and hit the enemy.  For me the bouncing missiles and fierce 2 player versus mode hooked me, and so when the iPhone launched we saw the opportunity to bring a similar type of game play to the younger generation of gamers.  The idea was to stick to simple game logic but utilize the powerful features of the iPhone to create something great.  Truthfully, we just created it also because we wanted to play it – and we tried to stay true to the game play fundamentals that made the original games so addictive.  And while there are half a dozen tank style games in the App store, we hadn’t found one that scratched our itch for this classic arcade style play.

We hope, after playing, you will start to share our enthusiasm for tank games and that you will become a fan of iCombat.  We also want to make iCombat better in future updates, so please send us your feedback at icombatgame@gmail.com or post something here.  We are planning to offer prizes of some sort (maybe t-shirts or something) to anyone whose idea is implemented in future updates so send us your best suggestions for future changes such as new weapons, levels, enemies, etc.  If your idea is good and others support it in the comments we will do our best to make it happen.  I will be posting some ideas of my own in the coming days so don’t be shy to shoot them down if you think they are weak!

Related articles by Zemanta

• Internet Marketing iPhone Game Launches (shoemoney.com)
• Skype on the iPhone: Brilliant (nevillehobson.com)
• DirecTV beams down iPhone app (tuaw.com)
• Wii? PlayStation 3? Who Needs ‘Em? (technologizer.com)

Enter developer Owen Goss, creator of Dapple, who posted a self described “brutally honest” description several weeks ago about how he had done in his first month of sales. While Owen just came out with a lite version of his app and his experience is far from over, the numbers he provides highlight just how disheartening the launch period can be.  To sum it all up, in the first 24 days of Dapple being available it sold 131 copies worldwide.  That wouldn’t be such a bad deal if it were a side project, but Owen spent 6 months and over 30k developing the game (we should back out that he paid himself a salary throughout though).

While the reviews of Dapple have been strong and it clearly is a quality product, the game had a few key factors going against it.  First of all it entered a competitive game genre and had a $4.99 price point which couldn’t have helped much early on.  I won’t get into the full discussion around the pros and cons of Owen’s marketing strategy but check out the full story here if you are interested (also check out Owen’s awesome slides on his experience with Dapple here – pdf).  I am more interested in how he is dealing with the early setbacks.

Surely publishing sales data got Dapple noticed, evidenced by the fact that I am writing about Dapple now, but is this really going to help? And just how long do we tinker with our formulas until you know it is time to give up and try another app?  Is it until the lite version fails to boost paid downloads, or until or the price is dropped to $0.99, or maybe just until all of the major sites refuse to review the app?  As I get within a few days of submitting iCombat (that’s right, bugfixing is almost over!) I am trying to be optimistic but also prepared for a long hard slog of self promotion, begging, and screaming to get my app noticed.  We’ll see if I can avoid having to post a “brutally honest” entry of my own once my app launches…

Related articles by Zemanta

• Coder Collects a Cool Half-Million for iPhone Game (wired.com)
• Social Media as a Marketing Channel (myventurepad.com)
• App Store millionaires share their secrets (textually.org)
• Article: iPhone Gems: Three New Action Puzzlers, Three New Shooters (ilounge.com)
• boxee iPhone App now available (mobilecrunch.com)